Article
CAL-04-1034 and CAL-03-1034 are competing candidate readings for Stand Up in the MusicBrainz community index. Neither should be confirmed without evidence from the record itself or a contemporaneous Capital Artists ca...
The CAL-04-1034/CAL-03-1034 discrepancy for Stand Up comes from a MusicBrainz community note. Without the record itself or a contemporaneous catalogue, neither number should be treated as correct.
Keep the two candidate numbers separate
Give the edition table three fields: “Community candidate”, “Item printing” and “Contemporaneous catalogue”. Retain CAL-04-1034 and CAL-03-1034 with their respective sources; do not silently change the differing digit while transcribing.
- Record an access date for every screenshot or URL.
- Transcribe the sleeve, centre labels and runout separately wherever the number appears.
- Confidence should increase only when independent sources agree.
A misprint claim needs contemporaneous evidence
A database note alone cannot establish a misprint. Evidence would need to come from a record-label catalogue, production document, traceable contemporary copy or several consistent examples before the number can be described as a printing variant.
- Use distinct statuses for “possible”, “candidate” and “confirmed”.
- A seller’s listing title is not primary evidence.
- Record the risk of a mismatched sleeve and disc separately.
The edition still depends on the complete release record
Check the release year, place, label, media format, track order, centre labels and matrices on both sides together. A legible CAL number alone cannot establish the pressing batch or accessory configuration.
- Do not transfer a matrix reading between sides A and B.
- Judge accessories against the record for that specific release.
- Retain photographs and a pending status for any indistinct character.
Frequently asked questions about this record
Which CAL number is correct?
At present, both remain candidates. The item and a contemporaneous label source must be cross-checked before either can be confirmed.
Can a MusicBrainz note prove that one number is a misprint?
No. It is a community-sourced lead, not a primary record-company archive.
Is the number on the sleeve enough?
No. Check the centre labels, runout, track order and whether the sleeve is correctly paired with the disc.
Sources that can be checked directly
- MusicBrainz: community-sourced edition index: use community data only to locate candidate editions. The CAL-number discrepancy must be checked against the item or a contemporaneous label source.
- Library of Congress: general background on recorded-sound media (not evidence for this album edition): use it only for general background. It does not establish either CAL number for this release.
A source supports only the names, specifications or history expressly stated on its page. The edition, accessories, provenance and present condition of the item in hand must still be checked separately.
Related resources on this site
Organise the records using the fields on this page
To check Stand Up, provide the number on the sleeve, both centre labels, the complete runout and any contemporaneous purchase records. You can send a numbered list and clear photographs via WhatsApp, or call +852 9453 0784; making contact does not mean that an appraisal or quotation has been completed. Any conclusion remains subject to verifiable records and inspection of the item.
